Evolution is the state of constant change of living things
in reaction to an ever changing world.
The mechanisms of evolution are the theories in which the
evolutionary “change” process occurs.
The mechanisms of evolution are: The longer a single
creature can live the more offspring in can produce and pass along its special
DNA to future generations.
The rate of evolution in a species is dependent upon the
rate of its reproduction. The more often a species reproduces, the quicker the
change.
Among the fastest to reproduce and mutate are bacteria.
Bacteria can reproduce seventy two times in a single day. Yet, after trillions of
adaptive iterations, they are still only bacteria. After billions of
iterations, mice are still mice. After millions of selective breeding practices
and intentional manipulations, dogs are still dogs.
In evolutionary theory, the longer a species lives the more
evolved and advanced it becomes. But, where are the creatures that evolved
before humans or at the very least evolved at the same time? Animals and plants
alike require food, even prehistoric man—unless he ate rocks. There is no
species or creature on earth that compares to humans in intellect, creativity,
or constructive/destructive ability.
On one hand, scientists claim that a genetic mutation that
benefits the host in a certain environment will naturally allow the host to
live longer, allowing it to pass on the new gene to future offspring, more
frequently and for a greater duration. And, causing its offspring to do
likewise, until the entire species in that specific ecosystem carries those
genes.
But, on the other hand, scientists are now claiming that for
multiple coinciding genes to develop at the same time, that they are dormant
genes passed along to subsequent generations in the background until they all
come together many iterations later.
For example: The bat sees by sonar. It would have had to
develop specialized vocal cords to make the right sound, and develop
specialized ears to hear the abnormal sounds, and at the exact same time it
would have to develop a specialized brain to process the reflected sounds to
produce an image of its surrounding. One of those traits alone would have done
nothing to help the creature.
But, how would a species benefit from an Allele (a dormant
gene) in order to survive longer-to be naturally selected.
And, of all known genetic mutations, all have been benign or
harmful to the animal. Two headed snakes die early, without ever breading. Two
heads, extra eyes, a leg on a snake, you name it, and none of those animals
survived very long at all. Only the benign- Six fingers, three arms, a third
nipple- lived a normal length of life.
To evolve is for a species to adapt or change to meet the
demands of its environment.
Evolution, however, is no longer “a state of evolving”, but
a desperate attempt to find the origins of life, from rocks and mineral
elements.
Nothing on earth eats rocks, sand, or metal. Water and
oxygen oxidize and erode them, but living things do not survive by eating them.
Plants and animals eat dirt (soil) that is organic. They get their life from
other formerly living things. They do consume minerals and nutrients from dirt
for life, but they grow from organic material.
Plant’s roots go into the soil and have fungus living on
them. The fungus breaks down matter from waste left by bacteria and feeds the
plant. Bacteria break down dead organisms and that organic waste is spread
across the earth through water and air. Nothing eats inorganic material as a
sole source of sustenance. Photosynthesis is the process in which carbon
dioxide (CO2) and water (H2O) is converted to glucose (C6H12O6) and oxygen (O2)
with energy from the sun.
Scientists agree that
the odds of life happening as a random act of accidental circumstance are
higher than if you put a typewriter out in a hail storm and have a perfect Shakespearean sonnet hammered out. But they always say, “it takes millions of
years,” because they know that it is impossible to conduct a million year
experiment or observation, so they can claim fiction as theoretical fact.
So, despite the odds of winning the lottery while being
attacked by a shark at the same time you are hit by lightning, we somehow
evolved into fish with legs and crawled out of the primordial soup and met
another that was exactly the same. Exactly the same! Animals cannot cross
breed. A cat and dog cannot have offspring. Our fish-monkey progenitor would
have been the luckiest man-thing that has been or ever will be. And then, it would have to happen again for every species on the planet.
Unless, of course, early man (non-gender specific) was
A-sexual. Then obviously people would be genetically homo sexual? (I don’t know
why homo sexual means gay, when homo in Latin means human. That’s, what… human
sexual?) There would be absolutely no need for men (masculine). In theory, we
evolved as asexual, to male-female sexual, and then to homosexual. But, the
species would no longer evolve—it would die. Without a man and a woman, humans
would be extinct. If homosexuality was genetic rather than a choice, it would
have bread out by now rather than raging out of control. I’m not going to
explain that here.
Homosexuality was prevalent five thousand years ago, it says
it in the bible, unless you don’t believe that part of the bible. So, it is
absolutely nothing new.
Say you wanted to slow the population growth of the world,
because you believe it is too crowded or something. How would you go about
that? Hitler tried by killing millions, and was killed for it. Giving birth
control out freely and to children, didn't even slow it. So, how about creating
a media storm about homosexuals and how they have rights and are tired of being
prosecuted. And, making nearly everyone on television, or on the movies, gay or
bisexual. Suddenly it’s a fashion, a fad, the next big thing. And to further
justify it, let’s say that its genetic, people don’t have a choice about being
born in the wrong body, everyone is born in the body of the wrong sex. Cover up
the fact that the government and eugenicists want this to happen, if people
found out that they were doing exactly what they wanted of them, oh no. I may
have digressed a little there.
Every year, scientists find out that they were wrong about
something. The theory of evolution has changed a thousand times in the last
hundred years to work around the mistakes. Yet, the bible’s account of creation hasn't changed in thousands of years. We have over ten thousand copies of original
manuscripts of the Old Testament dating back twenty-five hundred years ago. If
anything was changed over time, it would be apparent because there are so many
copies that are dated so far back. Hommer’s, The Odyssey, was written 700Bc and
is considered the most accurate historical document because we have eight
hundred copies.
The bible doesn't have proof of God; it was never intended
as proof in and of itself. The bible is a historical account of what God says
is important to mankind. The bible is already a massive book. How huge would it
have to be in order to describe and explain everything of irrelevance, in
detail? So far, everything provable in the bible has been correct. Rome ruled
the world under Cesar, Israelis moved to Jerusalem, anything else you can look
up. In the book, Snow Crash, he says that the bible is neither provable,
nor disprovable. If it were provable, there would be no need for faith. And if
it were disprovable, it would not be the most popular book ever written.
And, most importantly, people would be getting smarter as
they evolve, rather than dumber as seems to be happening. How is losing my tail
and gills an advantage? I would have grown wings, given the choice.
The Theory Of Evolution is a Belief System, not a Science.
We haven't even touched on entropy yet. Maybe this should be in part two.
We haven't even touched on entropy yet. Maybe this should be in part two.